« Failure is Just Success Delayed | Main | More on Motherhood & Child Influence »
July 14, 2006
On Breeding
While Michelle Goldberg's Salon article on: "to breed or not to breed," article is a little over three years old now, its increasingly becoming more and more relevant in the lives of women around me as we move towards our forties and leave those youthful thirties behind. (not yet baby :-)
Oddly enough, it has come up in discussion a few times in the past few months and then I found a link I had been saving, so decided to give it a re-read.
I find her views more common in my west coast world than with my east coast pals. She references an essay called No Baby On Board, where the female writer asks: "What would the return be on the investment?" "Are there any laws that would require my children to pay for my nursing home when I am old? Are they going to be a sufficient hedge against poverty and loneliness?"
It created a lot of controversy at the time since people commented that 'anyone who would think about childbearing in stark financial terms shouldn't be a parent in the first place.' I don't think anything in life is that black and white and certainly a lot of men I know have thought about their financial stability before getting married or raising a family. How can you not at least consider it?
According to a clinical psychologist interviewed for the article, "most parents, men and women, say they dramatically underestimated how intensely demanding, stressful and depleting parenthood would be."
She asks the question, partly wondering to herself (only 27 at the time she wrote the piece), "So will women who choose not to have children regret their effrontery in defying the whole history of the human race? Are they -- or we -- setting ourselves up for a lifetime of barren desolation?"
While people I've talked to with children (which is consistent with the writer's interviews and research) don't 'regret it,' many are often quick to add the stress that goes with it, the financial burden, impact on their careers, sleep, health, marriages, etc.
She also references a 1975 Ann Landers column, where Landers asked her readers: "Were the rewards enough to make up for the grief? If you had it to do over again, would you have children?" Apparently 70 percent of those who responded said no. Yikes. I find that astonishing, especially in the mid-seventies. I wonder what that number would be today.
I thought it was worth revisiting her article since I have so many friends going through the "should we or not?" question, and many of these couples are in their late thirties and early forties. There are some interesting pros, cons and points to consider, especially later in life. Both articles are interesting reads.
July 14, 2006 in On People & Life, On Women | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c79e69e200d834627aaa69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On Breeding:
» Kids, Old Age, and A Culture that Overdosed on Fake Independence from Learning The Lessons of Nixon
Renee Blodgett writes about whether or not having kids will mean youll have a better old age:
I find her views more common in my west coast world than with my east coast pals. She references an essay called No Baby On Board, where the female wr... [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 16, 2006 10:44:02 PM
Comments
I never really decided not to have children. I just made other decisions that made not having children inevitable.
I sometimes miss having kids. More often, I can't imagine having them.
My only worry is--as you indicate--about what'll happen when I'm old and can't take care of myself. Who's going to do it then? Two nieces and a nephew who live 3,000 miles away and know me only as an uncle who came to visit a couple of times a year? (One of many uncles, I might add--my sister-in-law has a big family.)
Posted by: Mitch Wagner | Jul 14, 2006 12:43:21 PM
Thanks for this. 37 and childless, I totally relate. I saw a hugely pregnant woman yesterday and instead of hearing my biological clock ticking, I thought, "gross." It might be time to stop fooling myself.
Posted by: Jennifer | Jul 14, 2006 2:53:33 PM
Ya know Mitch. That concern is always the first one to come up, and yet, having your children look after you when you're old and sick is never a guarantee.
I know several people (on both sides) who only had one sibling take care of it all and the others didn't show up, or showed up with a small check in hand to contribute. Frankly, your friends 'could do' that.
My grandfather had three sons and I was the one at his bedside when he died. My great grandmother had four sons, tons of grandchildren and great grandchilden and she outlived two of her sons - with that much legacy, she still had to do a lot of it on her own.
SO, if you remember that you can create family WHEREVER you go, WHEREVER you are, then that alone feeling or panic will just dissipate into the woodwork or wherever you want it to go :-)
Renee
Posted by: Renee Blodgett | Jul 14, 2006 6:34:27 PM
Good points, Renee.
I don't really panic about the growing-old-alone thing. At this stage in my life, I'd rate it as an "occasional cause for concern."
Ask me again in 20 years, when I'm 65, and I might give you a different answer.
Posted by: Mitch wagner | Jul 15, 2006 1:33:37 PM
While I'd say that my boys have given me life defining experiences and joys, I understand the decisions being made by many to not have children. It's too bad there's a need to justify...
The advent and proliferation of social media (like your blog) allows for thousands of warm, intelligent and caring peple to translate and pass on important knowledge, experience and values indirectly rather than a direct parent-child relationship. That's cool.
And fighting with your CSS stylesheets is like changing diapers ;-)
Posted by: David LaPlante | Jul 17, 2006 9:42:21 PM



















